| Author |
Message |
|
brux
MEPIS Rules!
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 12:11 pm Posts: 290 Has thanked: 15 times Have thanks: 24 times
|
Post # 265193
 synaptic signatures
I just reloaded the repos in synaptic and got this message "W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.mirrorservice.org mepis-11.0 Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG E6AD81A8B9FBE3CE Warren Woodford (MEPIS Maintainers) <dev@mepis.org>". Anyone else see this?
_________________ Ron Mepis 11 - 64 bit KDE 4.7.4 Nvidia GeForce 9800GT Vista
|
| Fri Mar 11, 2011 6:50 am |
|
 |
|
anticapitalista
MEPIS Guide
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:40 am Posts: 1738 Location: Greece Has thanked: 100 times Have thanks: 336 times
|
Post # 265194
 Re: synaptic signatures
_________________ anticapitalista Reg. linux user #395339.
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX "Edelweißpiraten" - lean and mean. http://antix.mepis.org
|
| Fri Mar 11, 2011 7:52 am |
|
 |
|
cphayes0882
MEPIS Novice
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 1:33 pm Posts: 25 Location: Southern Maryland Has thanked: 0 time Have thanks: 5 times
|
Post # 265200
 Re: synaptic signatures
Yup, same here, tried your link anticapitalista, no go
|
| Fri Mar 11, 2011 9:17 am |
|
 |
|
chinux
MEPIS Novice
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 5:21 pm Posts: 56 Location: Gole, Yorkshire Has thanked: 16 times Have thanks: 7 times
|
Post # 265201
 Re: synaptic signatures
Try this http://www.mepis.org/docs/en/index.php? ... tic_errorsIt worked for me. There is a link to GPG error giving 3 methods - I used easiest.
|
| Fri Mar 11, 2011 9:28 am |
|
 |
|
kmathern
MEPIS Enthusiast
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:26 pm Posts: 5134 Has thanked: 269 times Have thanks: 1396 times
|
Post # 265204
 Re: synaptic signatures
They don't work here. The "BADSIG" type of gpg error isn't even covered in the wiki.
|
| Fri Mar 11, 2011 9:55 am |
|
 |
|
Jerry3904
MEPIS Enthusiast
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am Posts: 6440 Location: Geneva NY Has thanked: 1378 times Have thanks: 1030 times
|
Post # 265206
 Re: synaptic signatures
I added it just now, though there is a template there... We have discussed this in the past: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=27848 and viewtopic.php?f=8&t=24645&view=nextI guess we need to let Warren know, then?
_________________ A Wiki only works when many eyes are on it.
32bit, 2.6.36-1-mepis-pae, KDE 4.6.5, AMD Phenom 9650 Quad-Core, Dell SP2309W with integrated webcam, Nvidia GeForce 6150SE, 4 GB DDR2
Last edited by Jerry3904 on Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
| Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:06 am |
|
 |
|
kmathern
MEPIS Enthusiast
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:26 pm Posts: 5134 Has thanked: 269 times Have thanks: 1396 times
|
Post # 265209
 Re: synaptic signatures
I think your second link has the best answer (by Nix Hard). Let Warren know, and then wait until the servers sync.
|
| Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:18 am |
|
 |
|
kmathern
MEPIS Enthusiast
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:26 pm Posts: 5134 Has thanked: 269 times Have thanks: 1396 times
|
Post # 265224
 Re: synaptic signatures
I have Warren's ftp.mepis.com mepis-11.0 repo enabled and the "BADSIG" error now seems to be fixed.
If you are using the mirror repo (ftp.mirrorservice.org), you will probably still get the "BADSIG" error until it syncs up with Warren's repo.
|
| Fri Mar 11, 2011 12:09 pm |
|
 |
|
Eadwine Rose
MEPIS Guide
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:10 am Posts: 2724 Location: The Netherlands Has thanked: 128 times Have thanks: 209 times
|
Post # 265225
 Re: synaptic signatures
So basically this error will go away in time?
_________________ SimplyMEPIS-1.5G_11.9.86_64 ext3 KDE 4.8.4 * AMD Asus M4A785TD-V EVO AM3 * ATI RS880GT Radeon HD 4200 * AMD Processor Athlon II X4 635, sAM3 * HDA ATI SB (VT1708S Analog) * 2x4Gb DDR3 1600 Kingston * 22" Samsung SyncMaster P2250 * HP DeskJet F2280
|
| Fri Mar 11, 2011 12:45 pm |
|
 |
|
kmathern
MEPIS Enthusiast
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:26 pm Posts: 5134 Has thanked: 269 times Have thanks: 1396 times
|
Post # 265226
 Re: synaptic signatures
I believe it will. If you read thru this thread viewtopic.php?f=8&t=24617 (read it at least down to Jimmy Johnson's post) it looks like the error eventually goes away.
|
| Fri Mar 11, 2011 12:51 pm |
|
|