checkaptgpg

Message
Author
User avatar
Jerry3904
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 15203
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

checkaptgpg

#1 Postby Jerry3904 » Mon Apr 11, 2011 1:41 pm

What is the status of this handy-dandy item for M11? I searched the forum but found nothing on it since this thread.

Has anyone tried to update the M 8.5 version? Is it possible to get this done before M11 Final?

(Bet you missed me...)
-----------------------------------
EDIT: I copied the script from M 8.5, changed ownership to root, and ran it:

Code: Select all

[root@BondDesktop Scripts]# sh checkaptgpg
Checking deb.opera.com_opera_dists_stable_Release
    Good GPG signature found.
Checking ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_squeeze_Release
    Good GPG signature found.
Checking ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_squeeze-updates_Release
    Good GPG signature found.
Checking ftp.mirrorservice.org_sites_ftp.mepis.org_mepis_dists_mepis-11.0_Release
    Good GPG signature found.
Checking main.mepis-deb.org_mepiscr_repo_dists_mepis11cr_Release
    No GPG Release signature found.
Checking main.mepis-deb.org_mepiscr_testrepo_dists_mepis11cr_Release
    No GPG Release signature found.
Checking restricted.mepis-deb.org_mepiscr_repo_dists_mepis11cr_Release
    No GPG Release signature found.
Checking restricted.mepis-deb.org_mepiscr_testrepo_dists_mepis11cr_Release
    No GPG Release signature found.
Checking security.debian.org_dists_squeeze_updates_Release
    Good GPG signature found.
Checking www.debian-multimedia.org_dists_squeeze_Release
    Good GPG signature found.
Looks good, but two of my repos not listed in the output give GPG errors when I run Synaptic:

Code: Select all

W: GPG error: http://download.virtualbox.org squeeze Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 54422A4B98AB5139
W: GPG error: http://debian.gfoss.it squeeze Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 87B91D5C6A7E8181
Looks like *we* are close, though.
Production: 4.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd64, MX-15 RC1, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 8 GB, Kingston SSD 120 GB and WesternDigital 1TB
Testing: AAO 722: 3.16-0-4-686-pae. MX-15, AMD C-60 APU, 4 GB

User avatar
Stevo
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 11203
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: checkaptgpg

#2 Postby Stevo » Mon Apr 11, 2011 8:13 pm

It would take a just a minute to repackage, though I'd like to redo the packaging to just use debhelper with a tiny rules file and /debian/install file, to make it really simple. With that technique, you can make deb packages out of scripts or documentation, such as a manual.

User avatar
Jerry3904
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 15203
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: checkaptgpg

#3 Postby Jerry3904 » Mon Apr 11, 2011 8:31 pm

Great, thanks. Now if someone will take a look at the script to see why it missed those repos we should be all set.

Anyone interested and able?
Production: 4.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd64, MX-15 RC1, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 8 GB, Kingston SSD 120 GB and WesternDigital 1TB
Testing: AAO 722: 3.16-0-4-686-pae. MX-15, AMD C-60 APU, 4 GB

User avatar
Adrian
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 6200
Age: 41
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:42 am

Re: checkaptgpg

#4 Postby Adrian » Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:08 pm

it also would be nice to integrate the script in one of the MEPIS utilities... just saying...

User avatar
Jerry3904
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 15203
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: checkaptgpg

#5 Postby Jerry3904 » Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:12 pm

Where it really belongs is in Synaptic, but that would take some serious coding prowess. I think if we get it so it works again, we or Warren should send it upstream.
Production: 4.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd64, MX-15 RC1, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 8 GB, Kingston SSD 120 GB and WesternDigital 1TB
Testing: AAO 722: 3.16-0-4-686-pae. MX-15, AMD C-60 APU, 4 GB

User avatar
Adrian
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 6200
Age: 41
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:42 am

Re: checkaptgpg

#6 Postby Adrian » Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:21 pm

Jerry3904 wrote:Where it really belongs is in Synaptic, but that would take some serious coding prowess. I think if we get it so it works again, we or Warren should send it upstream.


You are right, Synaptic should be able to download the keys when needed.

User avatar
Stevo
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 11203
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: checkaptgpg

#7 Postby Stevo » Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:34 am


User avatar
Jerry3904
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 15203
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: checkaptgpg

#8 Postby Jerry3904 » Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:07 am

Stevo wrote:OK, M11 package and source is here.
But...that script is still faulty (> OP). Also, didn't we have a version that only put in a single menu entry that required root access? The double entry is clumsy. Maybe I had the earlier version installed in my M 8.5.

I believe we need some *script masters* to get involved here, though so far this topic has attracted no interest from them.
Production: 4.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd64, MX-15 RC1, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 8 GB, Kingston SSD 120 GB and WesternDigital 1TB
Testing: AAO 722: 3.16-0-4-686-pae. MX-15, AMD C-60 APU, 4 GB

User avatar
Adrian
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 6200
Age: 41
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:42 am

Re: checkaptgpg

#9 Postby Adrian » Tue Apr 12, 2011 10:56 am

BTW, I recommend we put the code in Github, it's easier to manage and check.

User avatar
Stevo
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 11203
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: checkaptgpg

#10 Postby Stevo » Tue Apr 12, 2011 11:13 am

Jerry3904 wrote:
Stevo wrote:OK, M11 package and source is here.
But...that script is still faulty (> OP). Also, didn't we have a version that only put in a single menu entry that required root access? The double entry is clumsy. Maybe I had the earlier version installed in my M 8.5.

I believe we need some *script masters* to get involved here, though so far this topic has attracted no interest from them.


There's a normal and an "as-root" desktop file in the source, so I installed both. Just removing the entry for the normal one in the /debian/install file will only install the as-root. This is a native MEPIS package, so we also don't need to worry about altering any upstream source when we build it, we just have to make sure not to add any "-x" updates, instead the versioning should be something like 1.0.1mcr110+1, 1.0.2mcr110+1, 1.0.2mcr110+2 and so on.

The source code is there in my link, too, if it needs to be in github.
Last edited by Stevo on Tue Apr 12, 2011 10:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.


Return to “Betas-RC's only”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest