Question about support

Message
Author
User avatar
KBD
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 684
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Question about support

#11 Postby KBD » Mon Aug 29, 2011 3:20 pm

Thanks Michel!
KBD

User avatar
iridesce
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 606
Age: 58
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 1:44 am

Re: Question about support

#12 Postby iridesce » Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:31 pm

michelmassoud wrote:The good news with Linux in general and Mepis / Debian in particular is that they do not seem to get over bloated with new releases. Mepis 11 on my old computers is running better than Mepis 8.5.


I too have continuously been flat out amazed by this feature? of Mepis / Debian.

The quality in terms of ease of use increases.
The fit and finish continues to be more polished.
The applicability, without tweaking, to an expanding array of video / audio / peripherals .
And all without significant changes in basic hardware requirements past needing 1 GB of RAM

How do you explain that ?? ;)

I know that reviews tend to focus on the new and exciting abilities / features of new versions of OSs, but over the years I have come to value the stability and lack of bloatware as much, if not more than the hyped whiz / bang.
...Ostara.................................... minni
Image Image
...Mepis 11_64...........................Mepis 11_32

User avatar
timkb4cq
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 3427
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 4:05 pm

Re: Question about support

#13 Postby timkb4cq » Mon Aug 29, 2011 5:02 pm

It certainly helps that the Linux kernel is used in a wide variety of embedded products with limited resources, and that manufacturers of those products (or the components therein) are involved in kernel development. There's nothing like self-interest to keep code lean & efficient.
There's a different mindset when you're coding for a device with ram measured in kilobytes instead of gigabytes.
I know because the first coding I ever did was on a DEC PDP-8/e with 8K core memory shared between 4 TTYs (yes, actual ASR32 teletype machines - in 1973 video terminals would have cost much more than the computer).
MSI 970A-G43 MB, AMD FX-6300 (six core), 16GB RAM, GeForce 730, Samsung 850 EVO 250GB SSD, Seagate Barracuda XT 3TB

User avatar
DBeckett
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 3069
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 3:59 pm

Re: Question about support

#14 Postby DBeckett » Mon Aug 29, 2011 6:20 pm

iridesce wrote:I know that reviews tend to focus on the new and exciting abilities / features of new versions of OSs, but over the years I have come to value the stability and lack of bloatware as much, if not more than the hyped whiz / bang.

Ditto.
Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3, AMD FX-6100 hex-core, 3.3GHz, 8G, Radeon HD6570

User avatar
bowlkook
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 479
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 4:07 pm

Re: Question about support

#15 Postby bowlkook » Tue Aug 30, 2011 5:41 am

Jerry3904 wrote:
Might it be a good idea to update that section at some point to give a forecast of when Debian old stable security updates will last until? For Squeeze in this example.
Go ahead! That section was written after a lengthy discussion on this forum, research on Debian sites, and consultation with Warren. But if you see a way to improve it, just write it and let us know.

I think it just needs a one liner suggesting that security updates should be available until around 2013/14, based on the best estimates based on what Debian has provided in the past... Apart from that, it pretty much covers what happens in reality. i.e. the community supports as long as there is a demand.


Return to “General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests