Re: Mepis-Roadblock remaster
I have to agree with Rich here. Given the length of time I've used Mepis with KDE4 and Mepis with KDE3, I can not identify any single interface change that was counter-productive.
What I can identify is how KDE4 has changed or extended concepts of the desktop. If I might be honest, I think a lot of people are still turned off on KDE4 because of the KDE4 development cycle and the actual KDE 4.0 release. "Everybody," and we'll put quotes on that, thought that the KDE 4.0 release was a complete desktop environment that was 100% ready for use. It wasn't. The KDE 4.0 release was simply the completion of the underlying libraries and API's that backed the KDE Software Complication. That didn't stop major vendors such as Red Hat and Novell shoving KDE 4.0 releases into their Linux Distributions, so a lot of people who used those distributions got the idea that KDE 4.0 was an incomplete mess.
The problem is that the KDE developers never intended to permanently remove
features or functionality from the KDE Software Compiliation. By the KDE 4.4 release almost all of the comparitive functionality that had been lost in going from KDE 3.5.x to sub KDE 4.4 was already back in the interface. As of the KDE 4.7 branch more of KDE's "new" features, such as activities, were starting to mature into useful tools.
Additionally the separation of the System Functionality
from the User Interface
has also shown it's own direct benefits. KDE Software Compilation 4.5.x already includes the Plasma Netbook
interface which completely changes the entire user-interface layout, as well as changing background services in order to provide a desktop that requires less system resources and resolution to run. Additionally the user can make the switch from Plasma-Desktop
and back at any time
, even while programs are still running.
On top of that advancement several KDE Developers are working on Plasma Active
, which provides for a user-interface centered around Touch-Controls. Like Plasma-Desktop
, users can swap in real-time between Plasma-Active and the other User-interfaces, while programs are running. I've kind of been over this on an outside site
In light of what's possible with the KDE4 software compilation, projects like KDE-Trinity just look completely boneheaded. If the code-monkeys keeping KDE-Trinity alive were really interested in maintaining an exact replica of KDE 3.5.x... they should have just made a KDE 3.5.x. interface under KDE4 Plasma. Would have saved a lot of time, trouble, and distributions shipping KDE could be offering both Plasma-Desktop and Plasma-3.5.x UI's with minimal increase in file-size or art assets, just like KDE distributions offer both Plasma-Desktop and Plasma-Netbook.