| Author |
Message |
|
richb
Administrator
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 pm Posts: 8755 Location: Rochester NY Has thanked: 582 times Have thanks: 956 times
|
Post # 298737
 Re: Whoa there, Trigger!
I would argue the point that wheezy is not a good choice. The Debian maintainers are very conservative, and yes it is termed testing, but my experience is that applications are very solid, and if issues occur are corrected very quickly.
_________________ Forum Rules Guide - How to Ask for Help Link to Wiki Rich
Acer Laptop 5750G: Intel i5, 4 GIG mem, nVidia GT540M/Intel integrated graphics Kubuntu 13.04, KDE 4.10.2 M12 Alpha 2 in VirtualBox
|
| Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:05 am |
|
 |
|
Saist
MEPIS is cool!
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:57 am Posts: 792 Has thanked: 21 times Have thanks: 114 times
|
Post # 298738
 Re: Whoa there, Trigger!
We tried Ubuntu as a base in the past. There are lots of reasons we abandoned Ubuntu like a cat booking it out of a dog show. Given from what we've witnessed publicly in recent months, such as the treatment of Kubuntu and the Unity Desktop, the development situation with Ubuntu derivatives has actually gotten worse. I expect we'll see some of the better known Ubuntu derivatives scampering back to a Debian(pure) base just to get clear of Canonical.
_________________ Slow, lazy, but still around: Call me if ya need help http://zerias.blogspot.com http://www.mepisguides.com Biting the Bullet: Help Want to buy Mepis Based Computer? Ask me! http://bit.ly/fbs47I
|
| Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:11 am |
|
 |
|
reo_sam
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 8:55 am Posts: 13 Location: India Has thanked: 1 time Have thanks: 2 times
|
Post # 298739
 Re: Whoa there, Trigger!
The point was not that debian testing has conservative packages or not. The point was, debian testing does not have security updates, since it is a testing version anyways. And that is a very different update method than debian-stable packages. For desktop, use of testing is ok (but i would not do it).
Mepis is supposed to be a single good distro to work anywhere (be it desktop or server), hence, it using a debian-testing base will not be a good choice.
|
| Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:14 am |
|
 |
|
Danum
MEPIS Guide
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 5:49 pm Posts: 2454 Location: Doncaster UK Has thanked: 99 times Have thanks: 614 times
|
Post # 298740
 Re: Whoa there, Trigger!
If debian testing does not have security updates what is this repo. #deb http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates main contrib non-free #deb-src http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates main contrib non-free @Saist, Kubuntu have a new sponsor, so all at Kubuntu are happy campers, http://www.blue-systems.com/
_________________ *Never be afraid to try something new. Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic(Windoze)*
Kubuntu KDE 4.10.2 / Debian Wheezy-Experimental KDE 4.10.2 / Plasma Active 3 Tablet
|
| Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:20 am |
|
 |
|
richb
Administrator
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 pm Posts: 8755 Location: Rochester NY Has thanked: 582 times Have thanks: 956 times
|
Post # 298741
 Re: Whoa there, Trigger!
The point is whether Wheezy is suitable for Mepis. And therefore the conservative nature of the maintainers is germane. And as Danum pointed out there are security updates.
But the argument is moot as Warren will use what he wants.
_________________ Forum Rules Guide - How to Ask for Help Link to Wiki Rich
Acer Laptop 5750G: Intel i5, 4 GIG mem, nVidia GT540M/Intel integrated graphics Kubuntu 13.04, KDE 4.10.2 M12 Alpha 2 in VirtualBox
|
| Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:33 am |
|
 |
|
reo_sam
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 8:55 am Posts: 13 Location: India Has thanked: 1 time Have thanks: 2 times
|
Post # 298742
 Re: Whoa there, Trigger!
Debian testing has only "some" security updates. Way less than available for debian stable. See this link. http://www.debian.org/security/faq#testing Yes, the point is moot. Since, Warren is supreme. :)
|
| Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:43 am |
|
 |
|
Jerry3904
MEPIS Enthusiast
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am Posts: 6455 Location: Geneva NY Has thanked: 1388 times Have thanks: 1037 times
|
Post # 298743
 Re: Whoa there, Trigger!
Half an answer:  |  |  |  | Quote: Hi Jerry,
Based on the experience of the past few years, I'm trying a modified strategy.
My current plan, subject to change, is to put out a 100% Wheezy compatible version (12.0) prior to Wheezy final, and follow that in 6-9 months with a WheezyPlus (13.0) version, after Wheezy final.
This way, the people who want to run alternate desktops, and such, can do so from 12.0 without running afoul of MEPIS package tweaks.
And those who want to be more up to date in the long run, and use KDE only, will have 13.0. I expect that it will be possible to upgrade from 12.0 to 13.0, if you stick with KDE. But if you use an alternate desktop with MEPIS, you simply shouldn't plan on running 13.0.
To emphasize the difference, I may call 12.0 a stable release, and 13.0 an experimental release.
If I have the spare time, the alpha could be ready around May 1. |  |  |  |  |
Interesting, huh? What feedback for Warren do you think we should have about this?
_________________ A Wiki only works when many eyes are on it.
32bit, 2.6.36-1-mepis-pae, KDE 4.6.5, AMD Phenom 9650 Quad-Core, Dell SP2309W with integrated webcam, Nvidia GeForce 6150SE, 4 GB DDR2
|
| Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:19 am |
|
 |
|
KrispyKritter
MEPIS is cool!
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 8:09 pm Posts: 597 Location: Dallas, Texas Has thanked: 39 times Have thanks: 57 times
|
Post # 298744
 Re: Whoa there, Trigger!
The way I read this is that the packages that have made it to "testing" IE Wheezy at this time have had the security flaws that have appeared in their previous releases fixed. Therefore there is not as many security problems present. If something appears after their inclusion in "Testing" these problems will be addressed by security updates through the proper channels. #deb http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates main contrib non-free #deb-src http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates main contrib non-free The Debian people do not want to compromise anyone system in anyway. Remember they are running the same OS as the rest of us and as they test each release it will put their systems at the same risk because sooner or later you have to allow it to access the outside world (it cannot remain in an isolated environment forever) because when the end user gets it he/she is not going to be running inside a sterile environment. Steve
_________________
I messed with the dragon and now I am ready for the ketchup! The only stupid question is the one you already know the answer. ~Krispy Kritter~ Toshiba Satellite A215-S7427(AMD-64) Windows7/M11(KDE4.6.5)/M11(RoadblockTRK2-32) via Grub2
|
| Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:27 am |
|
 |
|
joany
MEPIS Enthusiast
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:45 pm Posts: 4873 Location: Penn's Woods Has thanked: 538 times Have thanks: 398 times
|
Post # 298745
 Re: Whoa there, Trigger!
 |  |  |  | Quote: Hi Jerry,
Based on the experience of the past few years, I'm trying a modified strategy.
My current plan, subject to change, is to put out a 100% Wheezy compatible version (12.0) prior to Wheezy final, and follow that in 6-9 months with a WheezyPlus (13.0) version, after Wheezy final.
This way, the people who want to run alternate desktops, and such, can do so from 12.0 without running afoul of MEPIS package tweaks.
And those who want to be more up to date in the long run, and use KDE only, will have 13.0. I expect that it will be possible to upgrade from 12.0 to 13.0, if you stick with KDE. But if you use an alternate desktop with MEPIS, you simply shouldn't plan on running 13.0.
To emphasize the difference, I may call 12.0 a stable release, and 13.0 an experimental release.
If I have the spare time, the alpha could be ready around May 1. |  |  |  |  |
This is consistent with Warren's numbering system, with major X.0 releases denoting changes to the Debian base, and minor X.5 releases denoting KDE/kernel upgrades to major releases. This is the information we've been looking for. What's interesting is that Warren is contemplating an experimental release. That's uncharacteristically cutting edge for him.
_________________ SimplyMEPIS is SimplyTHEBEST Mepis 8.5; 2.6.32-1-mepis-pae (Internal 2.6.32-12); 4GB RAM 2.4GHz AMD Athlon 4600+ NVidia GeForce 6150 LE; 304.51 Display Driver
|
| Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:34 am |
|
 |
|
Jerry3904
MEPIS Enthusiast
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am Posts: 6455 Location: Geneva NY Has thanked: 1388 times Have thanks: 1037 times
|
Post # 298749
 Re: Whoa there, Trigger!
Agreed. I suspect he knows where MEPIS is on DistroWatch and is trying to do something about it...
_________________ A Wiki only works when many eyes are on it.
32bit, 2.6.36-1-mepis-pae, KDE 4.6.5, AMD Phenom 9650 Quad-Core, Dell SP2309W with integrated webcam, Nvidia GeForce 6150SE, 4 GB DDR2
|
| Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:56 am |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: DBeckett and 0 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|